IN SITU COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEVERAL MEDITERRANEAN SPONGES AS POTENTIAL BIOMONITORS OF HEAVY METALS
Abstract
The heavy metals content of sponges is investigated in order to assess their suitability as biomonitors. The concentration of 10 elements is determined in six species of massive Demosponges well represented in a polluted and a clean site: Cliona viridis, Cacospongia scalaris, Chondrosia reniformis, Spongia officinalis, Spongia agaricina and Agelas oroides. Wide interspecific variations are observed between them, no doubt as a result of their morphological and physiological differences. Cliona viridis appears to be unique with regard to the higher concentrations found for several elements, especially Cd that is from 42 to 375 times more concentrated than in the other species. However, this species displays highly variable results and gives a rather poor image of the level of contamination of the sites, as only three trace elements out of ten have a significantly higher concentration in the polluted site. Three species, S. officinalis, S. agaricina and A. oroides, which give a consensual indication of the metals’ bioavailability, with sufficiently high and homogenous concentrations, appear to be well suited for consideration in the overall assessment of the marine environment quality.Downloads
Pubblicato
2018-05-23
Fascicolo
Sezione
Articoli
Licenza
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors mantain the rights to their work and give the journal the right of first publication, simoultaneously licensed under a Creative Common International License 4.0: Attribution - Noncommercial - Share-Alike, which allows to share the work declaring the intellectual paternity and the first publication in this journal
- Authors can subscribe othe non exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of their work (eg deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph) only if they declare that the first publication was in this journal.
- The authors can spread their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their own website) at the end of submission process (post print version).