THE USE OF CLAY MODELS IN AMPHIBIAN FIELD STUDIES: A SHORT REVIEW

Authors

  • Sebastiano Salvidio
  • Andrea Costa
  • Antonio Romano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15167/2612-2960/BELS2019.1.1.1048

Keywords:

aposematism, colour polymorphism, crypsis, plasticine, predation

Abstract

Clay models are realistic replicas of live animals that are frequently used in ecological and ethological field studies. These kind of models, usually made from plasticine, are malleable, easy to shape, colour and relative inexpensive. In addition, plasticine models retain marks on their surface allowing the identification of the predator and of the body part of the prey that was attacked. In this short review we retrieved and analysed a preliminary list of studies published until December 2017, that used clay replicas of amphibians in ecological field studies. Overall 25 publications were analysed. The first scientific paper using amphibian clay models was published in 1994, but only after the year 2005 the use of clay replicas became frequent in herpetological field researches. The majority of studies were performed in tropical or subtropical ecosystems of Central and South America, and only a relative small number of studies were executed in temperate forests of North America and Europe. The most studied family was Dendrobatidae with nine species. In Urodela the Plethodontidae, with four species, was the most studied family. After the analysis of the main features concerning technical aspects, geographic distribution and temporal trend of these kind of studies, the pros and cons of the use of amphibian clay models are synthetically discussed.

References

Bateman P.W., Fleming P.A., Wolfe A.K. 2017. A different kind of ecological modelling: the use of clay model organisms to explore predator-prey interactions in vertebrates. J. Zool. 301: 251-262.

Cronin T.W., Johnsen S., Marshall J., Warrant E.J. 2014. Visual ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Dreher C.E., Cummings M.E., Pröhl H. 2015. An analysis of predator selection to affect aposematic coloration in a poison frog species. PLoS ONE 10: e0130571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130571

Kraemer A.C., Adams D.C. 2014. Predator perception of batesian mimicry and conspicuousness in a salamander. Evolution 68: 1197-1206.

Kraemer A.C., Serb J.M., Adams D.C. 2016. Both novelty and conspicuousness influence selection by mammalian predators on the colour pattern of Plethodon cinereus (Urodela: Plethodontidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 889–900. doi: 10.1111/bij.12780

Kuchta S.R. 2005. Experimental support for aposematic coloration in the salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii xanthoptica: implications for mimicry of Pacific newts. Copeia 2005: 267-271. doi: 10.1643/CH-04-173R.

Gilbert R.O. 1987. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

Mcelroy M.T. 2016. Teasing apart crypsis and aposematism - evidence that disruptive coloration reduces predation on a noxious toad. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17: 285-294.

Paluh D.J., Hantak M.M., Saporito R.A. 2014. A test of aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio: The importance of movement in clay model experiments. J. Herpetol. 48: 244-254. doi: 10.1670/13-027.

Remon J., Bower D.S., Gaston T.F., Clulow J., Mahony M.J. 2016. Stable isotope analyses reveal predation on amphibians by a globally invasive fish (Gambusia holbrooki). Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 26: 724-735.

Rojas B. 2017. Behavioural, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of diversity in frog colour patterns. Biol. Rev. 92: 1059-1080.

Salvidio S., Romano A., Palumbi G., Costa A. 2017. Safe caves and dangerous forests? Predation risk may contribute to salamander colonization of subterranean habitats. The Science of Nature 104: 3-4.

Saporito R.A., Zuercher R., Roberts M., Gerow K.,G., Donnelly M.A. 2007. Experimental evidence for aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Copeia 2007: 1006-1011.

van Wijngaarden R., van Gool S. 1994. Site fidelity and territoriality in the dendrobatid frog Dendrobates granuliferus. Amphibia-Reptilia 15: 171-181.

Velo-Antón G., Cordero-Rivera A. 2011. Predation by invasive mammals on an insular viviparous population of Salamandra salamandra. Herpetol. Notes 4: 299-301.

Velo-Antón G., Cordero-Rivera A. 2017. Ethological and phenotypic divergence in insular fire salamanders: diurnal activity mediated by predation? Acta Ethol. 20: 243-253.

Wells K.D. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Willson J.D., Winne C.T., Pilgrim M.A., Romanek C.S., Gibbons W.J. 2010. Seasonal variation in terrestrial resource subsidies infl uences trophic niche width and overlap in two aquatic snake species: a stable isotope approach. Oikos 119: 1161–1171.

Yaeger J., Wooten C., Summers K. 2011. A new technique for the Production of large numbers of clay models for field studies of predation. Herpetol. Rev. 42: 357-359.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-09